Certified Protection Professional (CPP) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Certified Protection Professional Exam. Enhance your skills with multiple choice questions, detailed explanations, and study hints. Start your journey to certification success!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Who should lead the investigation in a gambling incident?

  1. A proprietary investigator only

  2. A private attorney

  3. Local law enforcement in conjunction with proprietary investigators

  4. State emergency response teams

The correct answer is: Local law enforcement in conjunction with proprietary investigators

Leading an investigation into a gambling incident typically requires the expertise and authority that local law enforcement can provide. These officials have the necessary training and resources to handle incidents that may involve crime, fraud, or other legal implications. Local law enforcement is equipped to assess the situation, gather evidence, and coordinate with other agencies if necessary. The involvement of proprietary investigators can complement the law enforcement efforts. They often have specialized knowledge of the gambling industry and can assist in gathering information that may be relevant to the case. However, their role is typically advisory or supplemental rather than leading the investigation. The other options, such as a proprietary investigator or a private attorney, generally lack the legal authority needed to conduct a thorough investigation. Proprietary investigators may not have the same jurisdiction or access to law enforcement databases and tools, while private attorneys focus more on legal analysis and representation rather than active investigation. State emergency response teams are typically activated in scenarios involving public safety threats or large-scale emergencies, rather than specific localized incidents related to gambling. Thus, their role would not be appropriate in this context.